Author name: Admin

DSC_1062_Healthcare_workers_at_BLM_(49984962028)
Featured

For Black Caregivers, The Fight For Democracy Is...

Another weekend of mass actions in the books, but the momentum behind the second No Kings Day continues through cross-issue organizing and everyday workers lifting up their voices and taking action. With the increasing concern over rising health care costs and cuts to necessary programs, SEIU member home care workers like Athena Jones and Phyllis Pride see an opportunity beyond one-off days of action. Speaking with NewsOne, Jones called the issues affecting home care workers central to the provision of care itself and impact many families and communities who could lose access to care, food, and dignity. As an example, she pointed to a proposed federal rule that would allow people to be reclassified as “companions” so they could be paid lower wages, in some cases, less than $7.25 an hour. “The fight for democracy lives in our hands, the same hands that bathe, clean, feed, and care for those who cannot care for themselves or who choose to live at home with dignity,” Jones said. “As home care providers, we do the work that keeps this country standing, yet our labor is often invisible. No one should survive on less than a living wage.” Jones said that while she did not participate in a local gathering, she carried the spirit of the day of action with her as she knocked on doors for Abigail Spanberger, a candidate for Virginia governor. She said that people cannot sit by and allow self-proclaimed kings to take power without repercussions. “Protecting workers, preventing authoritarian overreach, and demanding rights for all are achieved through collective bargaining for home care providers and all workers,” Jones said. “Every knock I make, every conversation I have, is a stand against unchecked power. Care work is political, and each vote is a declaration that compassion, labor, and community matter more than kings or rulers who refuse to listen.” A Homecare Chapter Chair with SEIU Virginia 512, Jones reflected on the historical importance of Black labor organizing, calling it “political and transformative.” “Labor organizing has always been a critical tool for Black communities to claim dignity, voice, and power. Historically, unions were not just about wages,” she said. “They were about who gets heard, who gets to vote, and who gets to live with dignity.” According to Jones, care work becomes political action through deep organizing and advocacy. Given the central nature of care to our economy and communities, it is a major aspect of having a representative democracy. “Organizing care workers ensures protections, fair wages, and the political voice that safeguards communities,” she said. “Democracy is impossible if those who sustain it cannot live with dignity.” Michigan home health worker Phyllis Pride echoed similar sentiments about the innate nature of political advocacy in care work. “Healthcare workers —especially home care workers — are advocates through and through,” she said. “We not only fight for the rights of other caregivers, but for the people we care for, too.” Pride said that much of the work of home care workers involves the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The very tenets of democracy are built into their charge. Organizing with Michigan Home Care Workers United and SEIU has helped Pride expand her advocacy and elevate her voice further. “I’ve spoken to elected leaders at the federal and state levels on behalf of all Michigan caregivers and the people we care for to show just how important long-term care is in our communities,” she said.  “Caregivers have to speak up every chance we get. If we don’t, who will?” She also pointed to the necessity for collective action and building power, citing as a recent source of inspiration the over 32,000 Michigan home care workers who voted to unionize, joining the SEIU ranks. Nationally, home health workers are overwhelmingly Black and other women of color and often have low wages and no benefits. Under the leadership of President April Verritt, SEIU has positioned itself as a visible leader within the national coalition fighting at the intersection of democracy and economic justice. With the need for home health caregivers expected to grow within the next 10 years, cuts to funding programs, including Medicaid and Medicare, could impact the services offered to those in need. The cuts enacted earlier this summer through the Trump administration’s OBBBA legislation are estimated to have disastrous impacts on those relying on care and the providers who serve them. Jones and Pride share that these issues aren’t simply policy issues or a matter of politics, but directly impact racial and economic justice. Whether they are fighting for better wages and conditions for home health care workers or advocating for funding and resources for long-term care, Jones and Pride see the current moment as requiring a transformation of systems to respect workers, families, and communities. “We honor this work by advancing democracy, not crowning kings, and by demanding a system that respects our labor,” Jones said. “I am inspired by thousands of care workers who organize, fight for a living wage, share their stories, and speak truth to power. Together, we transform individual care into collective strength.” SEE ALSO:  Chicago Mayor Evokes Black History In ‘General Strike’ Call At No Kings 2.0 The Silence Of The Gavel: Why The Fight For Section 2 Of The Voting Rights Act Is The Fight For Our Republic 

Joy_Reid,_2016_Hofstra_Presidential_Debate
Featured

Joy Reid Content Creator Speak Out After DHS...

Journalist Joy Reid is crying foul after the Department of Homeland Security used an allegedly altered social media sketch to seemingly make it look like a threat to federal immigration agents. The content creator whose footage was used is also speaking out and considering his legal options after DHS’ post allegedly sparked harassment and even death threats. Homeland Security’s post issued a warning to the TikTok creator and others to “FAFO” or “f*** around and find out” if they planned on attacking law enforcement. Viral Video Sparks Outrage According to Baller Alert, the Department of Homeland Security’s official X account initially shared a clip of a Black man wearing a ski mask and standing in front of a group of young Black men. The background appears to show a basketball court with pavement markings and fencing. The caption on the DHS post read, “ICE we’re on the way. Word in the streets cartels put a $50K bounty on y’all.” The alarming message spread quickly, leading viewers to believe the group was threatening Immigration and Customs Enforcement. However, social media users later uncovered that the clip was not new and that its caption had been changed. Side-by-side comparisons revealed the DHS version appeared to be altered and AI-enhanced, and the unedited clip, filmed months earlier as part of a “U.S. vs. Iran” TikTok trend, contained no references to ICE or law enforcement. In the original version, the background also appears to show a paved walkway with street lights and a city skyline—a completely different location from the basketball court shown in the alleged DHS edit. The Creator Speaks Out The man in the video has since been identified as TikTok user @mrfloridajhit, who says he had nothing to do with the caption DHS attached to the post. He told followers that his account was hacked and that he never uploaded or approved the version federal officials shared. On Instagram, he wrote, “I did not post that video or the caption on that video. My account was hacked… I have no clue how they were able to get that video.” Allegedly, the previous post was the one below. The creator told followers that the other men in the clip were simply friends participating in a TikTok trend. None of them knew the footage would later be used out of context or paired with a false caption. Joy Reid Speaks Out, Blasts DHS For Alleged AI Video Joy-Ann Reid also called out the Department of Homeland Security for the post, describing it as an alarming example of how technology and anti-Black bias can intersect in dangerous ways. “They essentially used this man’s video to create a fake threat against ICE from young Black men,” Reid said in a TikTok video. “They’ve weaponized antiblackness—they’ve weaponized a lie that these federal agents are being threatened and that there’s a bounty on their heads.” Reid also pointed to the irony of the timing, noting that the Trump administration has faced widespread criticism for its handling of immigration raids and viral clips showing families detained or separated. “These people are out of control, and yet they want you to believe that the real threat is young Black men,” she continued. “If your government can steal your content to weaponize a falsity against Americans, threatening their lives, what else could they do using your social media?” Takeaway: Be Careful On the Internet  It is unnecessary for the government to use a video of young men to weaponize fear. Government platforms should be used to uplift and inform. ICE should be composed of trained individuals who act accordingly in person, not to an online video—unless addressing verified entities. The Trump administration already describes its tactics as “the Department of War.” There are plenty of people who disagree with how ICE has handled recent matters, from Los Angeles to Chicago. Regardless, people have the right to free speech. That said, whoever is running the government account and engaging in fear-mongering should be fired or redirected, because leadership should do just that: lead. In situations like these, all negativity does is add to the continued distrust in the current administration. The post Joy Reid & Content Creator Speak Out After DHS Uses Allegedly Altered Video To Portray ICE Threat appeared first on Bossip.

ETalk2008-Diddy1
Featured

Diddy’s Team To Appeal Conviction

Sean “Diddy” Combs isn’t backing down, and is officially appealing his conviction after being found guilty on two prostitution-related charges this summer. This news comes amid conflicting reports that the White House could commute his sentence as early as this week. According to ABC News, Diddy’s legal team filed a notice of appeal in New York’s Federal District Court this week. His lawyer, Alexandra Shapiro, confirmed the move but didn’t outline the grounds of the appeal just yet. The 55-year-old music icon has already spent a year behind bars at Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center. While his sentence totals 50 months, he’s hoping his next move could cut that time down significantly. Diddy’s defense has long argued that the charges, which include “transportation for the purposes of prostitution,” shouldn’t even apply to him. At sentencing, he reportedly broke down in tears, apologizing for “the hurt that I caused” but standing firm that his mistakes don’t define who he is today. Meanwhile, social media was buzzing after TMZ reported that Trump was considering commuting Diddy’s sentence, but the White House quickly shut those rumors down. Officials clarified that there’s “no truth” to claims of a pending commutation. But, TMZ immediately pushed back in an update to their reporting, claiming that their story about the commuting rumors was true. “The White House Communications Office is saying our story is not true, TMZ wrote. ” We stand by our story. Our story is accurate.” This also comes amid one of the attorneys on Combs’ defense team previously revealing that they approached Trump’s administration for a pardon. “It’s my understanding that we’ve reached out and had conversations in reference to a pardon,” Nicole Westmoreland, a member of Combs’ defense team, told CNN on Tuesday, Aug. 5. When she was asked how the Bad Boy founder feels about his chances for a pardon, Westmoreland told the outlet that Diddy “is a very hopeful person and I believe that he remains hopeful.” Trump Previously Spoke On The Possibility Of Pardoning Diddy As previously reported, Trump, himself, hasn’t been shy about addressing their past relationship, noting that he took issue with how “hostile” Diddy was to him during his Presidential bid. “Well, he was essentially, I guess, sort of half-innocent,” Trump said to NewsMax. “I don’t know what they do, still in jail or something. But he was celebrating a victory, but I guess it wasn’t as good of a victory.” “We’re human beings. We don’t like to have things cloud our judgment, right? But when you knew someone and you were fine and then you run for office and he made some terrible statements,” he continued. “So, I don’t know. It’s more difficult. Makes it more, I’m being honest, makes it more difficult to do.” RELATED: Here’s What Happened When Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Was Sentenced To More Than 4 Years In Prison The post Diddy’s Team To Appeal Conviction & Prison Sentence Amid The White House Denying Trump Commutation Claims appeared first on Bossip.

Blac_Chyna_by_dvsross
Featured

Angela ‘Blac Chyna’ White Gushes Over ‘My Person’...

Blac Chyna can’t keep her composure while talking about the possibility of rekindling her relationship with ex Rob Kardashian. After sparking reconciliation rumors last week, the model—who now goes by her birth name, Angela White— was asked about the status of her relationship with the former reality star during an appearance at the Los Angeles Women’s Expo on Saturday, October 18. While talking about wanting to have more children, Chyna admitted that she would rather welcome more kids with Kardashian than her other ex, Tyga, in a video obtained by TMZ. Chyna and Kardashian are parents to daughter Dream, 8, while she and Tyga share 13-year-old son King Cairo. When asked point-blank whether she and Kardashian are back together, the model giggled and took some time to think before explaining that they are both “healing” and “communicating.” “We’re just going with the flow,” she said. “And if it’s God’s [will] then it will be something.” The model went on to gush that Kardashian is “hilarious,” adding, “We’re just taking our time. I’m excited…He’s my person. I just gotta work on myself, and he’s gotta work on himself.” This comes after Chyna first sparked reconciliation rumors last week, uploading a series of photos to Instagram along with the caption, “This love is forever .” She tagged Rob in the caption, who “liked” the post. While a source revealed to Page Six at the time that the exes were not back together, it looks like they’re doing their best to make it happen. Rob and Chyna got engaged in 2016 after a rollercoaster romance, but their relationship ended shortly after, in 2017. In the years since their split, the former couple has had their fair share of drama, with Chyna suing Rob’s mother, Kris Jenner, and his sisters Kim Kardashian, Khloe Kardashian and Kylie Jenner for defamation. At the height of their breakup in 2017, things got even worse, with Kardashian exposing naked pictures of his ex, causing Chyna to enlist powerhouse lawyer Lisa Bloom for a “revenge porn” lawsuit. That same year, Rob claimed Blac Chyna attempted to choke him with an iPhone charger during an intense fight last at sister Kylie Jenner’s house. The reality star and his sister filed a lawsuit against Rob’s ex-fiancé for battery, assault and vandalism. Things between the former couple have been quiet over the last few years–until now. If you need to catch up on their history amid their suspected rekindling, check out a timeline of their relationship here. The post Angela ‘Blac Chyna’ White Gushes Over ‘My Person’ Rob Kardashian Amid Reconciliation Rumors: ‘We’re Just Going With The Flow’ appeared first on Bossip.

Judges_Gavel
News

Why The Fight For Section 2 Of The...

I’m struggling to find the words to capture the sheer panic I feel right now, but it’s a panic born of truth: the very foundation of our representative democracy is under threat. What’s unfolding before the U.S. Supreme Court over Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 isn’t a procedural argument; it’s an existential crisis that could permanently reshape the political landscape and silence the voices of millions of Americans—particularly those of color. On Wednesday, justices from the highest court in the land began weighing in on a case that will determine whether democracy is going to continue to weaken and be dismantled by questioning one of the most critical safeguards of the civil rights era, Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965; an act that ensures the government must continue to take proactive steps to ensure fair representation for Black and Brown people. The case sparking the review, Louisiana v. Callais, stems from a dispute over a single congressional district in Louisiana, drawn after the 2020 Census to ensure that African American voters could elect a candidate of their choice. The state initially drew maps that featured only one majority-Black congressional district, rejecting seven more racially fair maps. Voters sued, and federal courts ordered Louisiana to comply with the Voting Rights Act by drawing new maps in which Black voters would be a majority in a second district, thereby reflecting their share of the population and giving Black Louisianans an equal opportunity to elect representatives of their choice. The current case, presented by a group of people identifying themselves as “non-African-American voters” have sued to get those racially proportionate maps thrown out, arguing that enforcement of the VRA violates their own rights under the 14th and 15th amendments, claiming that the maps drawn to remedy racial discrimination against Black people instead constitutes racial discrimination against non-Black (aka: white) people. While the case appears to be localized, it will affect voting on the national level because, at the core, the case is about whether state governments can continue to address discrimination, both historic and ongoing, by taking intentional action to ensure fairness and representation. “Section 2 has had a major impact, definitely in the South, but really nationwide on improving political representation opportunities for voters in a lot of different communities of color and all around the country,” Kareem Crayton, vice president of the Brennan Center for Justice’s office in Washington, D.C., said. “A decision that leaves the current understanding of Section 2 in grave doubt opens up, unfortunately, a lot of chaos throughout the country in a lot of different jurisdictions.” For decades, the landmark ruling has served as the precedent and legal tool to combat racial gerrymandering, especially in states with racially polarized voting patterns, like Texas, and their controversial decision to redistrict to find 5 Republican seats for the Trump administration to continue their reign of incompetence. The Court’s conservative majority, however, has signaled skepticism toward the continued use of race-conscious districting, seemingly siding with the plaintiffs. During recent oral arguments, several justices questioned whether such measures should have an “endpoint,” suggesting discomfort with what they view as race-based policymaking. Justice Brett Kavanaugh echoed that sentiment, stating that “race-based remedies are permissible for a period of time… but they should not be indefinite.” “The issue, as you know, is that this court’s cases in a variety of contexts have said that race-based remedies are permissible for a period time – sometimes for a long period of time, decades in some cases – but that they should not be indefinite and should have an end point,” Kavanaugh told the attorney representing a group of Black voters who successfully challenged Louisiana’s first map. Civil rights advocates argue that this framing ignores the persistence of racial polarization in American elections. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson underscored that point, reminding the Court that Section 2 “is not a remedy in and of itself but the mechanism by which the law determines whether a remedy is necessary.” In her view, the law’s enduring application is not a distortion of equality but an affirmation of it. During oral arguments, the plaintiffs’ attorney suggested that the defense were demanding a second majority-Black district, prompting Jackson to interject: “No, it’s not,” clarifying that the litigation was about addressing proven vote dilution, not entitlement to a specific remedy; underscoring the constitutional interest in remedying racial discrimination, a point echoed by Justice Elena Kagan earlier in the session. Alanah Odoms, executive director of the ACLU of Louisiana, highlighted the significance of the ruling and why the reversal would adversely affect communities of color’s ability to fully and fairly participate in democracy. “The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has affirmed what we’ve always known: Black voters in Louisiana deserve equal representation,” Alanah Odoms, executive director of the ACLU of Louisiana, said. “This is a vital step toward correcting generations of injustice, and we will not stop until every Black Louisianan has the full and fair representation guaranteed to all Americans.” The political consequences of a ruling against Section 2 could be profound. According to a report by the Black Voters Matter Fund and Fair Fight Action, if Section 2 is overturned, Republican-controlled states could redraw at least 19 additional congressional districts to their advantage. The impact would be immediate in states such as Texas, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana, and North Carolina, all regions with significant minority populations and deeply polarized voting patterns. Freed from the obligation to draw “minority opportunity districts,” lawmakers could fracture Black and Latino communities across the country in multiple districts by isolating them into single heavily Democratic districts and reducing their overall influence. According to the report, as much as 30% of the Congressional Black Caucus and 11% of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus could lose their seats. In states such as Alabama, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Tennessee, Black voters could lose all federal representation. Cliff Albright, co-founder and executive director of Black Voters Matter Fund, warned that

Zohran_Mamdani_at_the_Resist_Fascism_Rally_in_Bryant_Park_on_Oct_27th_2024
Featured

Zohran Mamdani: NYC Mayoral Debate Shows How He...

Political experts and fans alike believe, Democratic Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani emerged victorious from his first NYC mayoral debate on Oct. 16. Facing off against former Governor Andrew Cuomo and Republican politician Curtis Sliwa, Zohran Mamdani appeared confident and composed as he tackled a wide range of issues, from policing New York City and addressing the mental health crisis to unveiling an ambitious plan to tax the wealthy to make the city more affordable for millions. “Well, really, what happened is you had Zohran Mamdani going into this as the clear frontrunner in nearly every poll that we have seen since his upset Democratic primary win back in June. And quite frankly, he left this debate as the clear frontrunner,” said Nick Reisman, a political reporter with Politico, during an interview with CBS News on Oct. 17. “Mamdani did not have really any major mistakes that he made,” Reisman continued. “Andrew Cuomo tried to trip him up on a few key issues that have been really kind of difficult for Mamdani during this campaign, like Israel and public safety, and Mamdani, for the most part, was able to parry a lot of those attacks, and he got through on his message about affordability and the cost of living.”   Zohran Mamdani On Israel And Hamas The NYC mayoral debate began with Mamdani addressing his position on the conflict between Israel and Hamas and responding to questions about the recent ceasefire agreement. Earlier in his campaign, Mamdani had said he didn’t hold “opinions about the future of Hamas and Israel beyond the question of justice and safety,” but on Thursday night, the 33-year-old made his position clear. “Of course, I believe that they should lay down their arms. I’m proud to be one of the first elected officials in the state who called for a ceasefire,” he told the moderators. “Calling for a ceasefire means seizing fire. That means all parties have to cease fire and put down their weapons. And the reason that we call for that is not only for the end of the genocide, but also an unimpeded access of humanitarian aid. I, like many New Yorkers, am hopeful that this ceasefire will hold.” On Policing And Mental Health When it came to tackling the issue of policing in NYC and the city’s mental health crisis, Mamdani stressed that he does not support defunding the NYPD, but instead advocates for reforming the system by implementing a multi-layered response model for mental health crises. He referenced the approach taken in Eugene, Oregon, where mental health professionals are dispatched alongside police during certain emergency calls. Under his plan, operators would be specially trained to assess crises and involve law enforcement only when necessary. He also made it clear that he would oppose any use of the National Guard in NYC for public safety purposes, contrasting his stance with what’s being done in cities like Chicago and Los Angeles by the Trump administration. “We do not need the National Guard here in New York City. We do not need them for the purpose of safety, because if it was safety that President Trump was so concerned about, he would send them to the eight out of 10 states that have the highest levels of crime in this country, but he won’t, because they’re all run by Republicans,” Mamdani said. “What New Yorkers need is a mayor who can stand up to Donald Trump and actually deliver on that safety. When Donald Trump sent ICE agents on people in Los Angeles, Andrew Cuomo said that New Yorkers need not overreact. That is the furthest answer that New Yorkers are looking for. They are looking for someone who will lead.” On How He Plans To Fund His Vision For The City Mamdani’s platform includes approximately $10 billion in proposed new spending, which he says will be funded through increased taxes on the wealthy and large corporations. Despite Governor Kathy Hochul’s stance against raising income taxes on millionaires, Mamdani remained firm on his plan during the NYC mayoral debate. “A lot of people have called even my campaign a non-starter when we first began, and now I stand before you proud to be the Democratic nominee who got the most votes in city primary history. And I believe we will see the same thing with our push to ensure that we are taxing the wealthiest and the most profitable corporations the fair amount that they should pay,” he said with conviction. The Democrat added, “Now there are those who will say that, because it will be hard, you should give up. We saw what giving up looked like when Andrew Cuomo was the governor. He gave up on fighting for working-class New Yorkers and instead caved in to his billionaire donors.” On Making New York City Affordable Again Mamdani outlined several ways to ease the cost of living in the city, with proposals like free and faster bus service, universal childcare, and freezing rents, all while increasing revenue through tax reforms and budget efficiency. “Look, I’ve said very clearly, making buses fast and free costs about $700 million a year. Making universal child care a reality costs about $5 or $6 billion a year. If you raise the state’s top corporate tax rate to match that of New Jersey, you’ll be raising $5 billion in of itself,” he explained. “We have also put forward a plan to save money here in New York City with a billion dollars in savings through procurement reform, through following the independent Budget Office’s assessment about hiring more fiscal auditors, and an action to collect the fines and fees from bad landlords,” he continued. “Freezing the rent doesn’t require any fiscal infusion, so that will be something we’ll be pursuing immediately. And universal childcare—after housing—is the second cost. Childcare is the second cost pushing New Yorkers out of this city, twenty and a half thousand dollars a year is the estimate we’ve seen. That will be a priority.” Social

Kim_Kardashian_(6307608171)
Featured

Kim Kardashian On The Breaking Point In Her...

Kim Kardashian is pulling back the curtain on her “toxic” marriage and kurrent ko-parenting life with her ex-husband, Ye, and she’s not sugarcoating a thing. In a candid sit-down on the Call Her Daddy podcast, Kimmy Kakes got real about the highs, lows, and hard lessons learned while raising four children with the rap mogul. According to The Hollywood Reporter, Kim opened up about the early days of her relationship with Ye, describing him as “larger than life,” before admitting that his first public mental health struggles were a turning point for their marriage. The pair first tied the knot in 2014, had four kids, and finalized their divorce in 2022, but co-parenting after such a public split hasn’t been easy, according to the SKIMS founder. “I mean, I raise the kids full-time. They live with me,” Kim shared, explaining that while she encourages a healthy relationship between Ye and their children, things haven’t been smooth. “It’s probably been a couple months since we’ve heard from him.” In the Call Her Daddy interview, Kim added that the kids have grown used to their father’s fast-paced, globe-trotting lifestyle, noting: “They always knew that he had a big life traveling before and was always on tour and all of that…and that he lives in different countries all the time.” Still, Kardashian said she’s worked hard to protect her kids’ peace. “Every time he has asked, I will always let them see their father,” she emphasized. “I just grew up seeing my family co-parent so great…I welcome healthy relationships, but it’s not easy.” When asked how she deals with public narratives, often started by Ye, that accuse her of keeping the kids away, Kim didn’t hold back: “It’s not a kidnapping, it’s a divorce,” she said. Despite the rollercoaster, Kim made it clear she has no regrets about her decade-long relationship with Ye. Co-parenting is just another chapter in the Kardashian-West saga; Kim also discussed divorcing the rapper after their marriage turned “toxic.” Kim Kardashian Details Ending “Toxic” Ye Marriage When asked about a breaking point in her marriage, Kim cited Kanye’s erratic behavior and financial decisions, as well as his kopious komments about her mom and sisters. “Just not feeling safe, you know, not even physically, just like maybe emotionally or even, you know, financially,” she said on Call Her Daddy. “I would like come home, and we had like five Lamborghinis and I’d come home and they’d all be gone if he was in an episode. And I’d be like, ‘Oh, wait. Where’s all our cars? Like, my new car?’ And it would be like, oh, he gave them away to all of his friends.” She also noted that Ye’s mental health struggles were affecting her ability to parent their children; North, 12, Saint, 9, Chicago, 7, and Psalm, 6. “Once my mental health starts to get affected and then I can’t parent the way that I need to and I can’t be present and focused, then there’s gotta be one of us that can,” she said. “And I had to save myself in order to be a better mom for everyone. And I think, like, when everyone’s older, they’ll be able to understand it and see that all.” What do YOU think about Kimmy Kakes’ kandid komments? Check out the full episode of Call Her Daddy with Kim Kardashian below. RELATED: Real Life Angel: Baller Babe Angel Reese Makes Her Catwalk Debut At The 2025 Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show, Stunner’s Gorgeous Gams Garner Rave Reviews The post Kimmy Kakes Kandidly Komments On The Breaking Point In Her ‘Toxic’ Ye Marriage—’I Had To Save Myself’ appeared first on Bossip.

Featured

Baller Babe Angel Reese Makes Her Catwalk Debut...

Whether she’s on the court or on the catwalk, Angel Reese is always the star of the show. The Chicago Sky star made her way down the runway for the very first time on Wednesday, October 15, wearing two all-pink ensembles as she got her Victoria’s Secret Angel wings. For her first look, Reese walked like a pro in a coordinating white bra, garter, and panties set, completely embellished with pink flowers. She also had a pink shawl draped over her arms, which was covered in even more flowers to complete the look. For her second ensemble, the WNBA star rocked a simpler set, making her bombshell silver-and-white wings the star of the show. She wore a pink tee with a cheeky cut-out around her chest and a slit above her waist. The slits unveiled a matching pink bra and underwear, completing the look with strappy silver sandals and an undeniable mug. A week before stepping on the iconic stage, Reese opened up about her feelings leading up to the big moment, telling PEOPLE: “I’m ready to swap my Angel Reese 1s for heels on Wednesday night!” She also recalled her reaction to when she first got the news that she would be a Victoria’s Secret Angel, admitting, “I literally could not stop smiling!” “It’s such a surreal and full-circle moment — just last year I was in the audience manifesting being on that runway, completely inspired and in awe of all the powerful women walking down the runway, and now I get to return as an Angel,” she continued. “This will be an unforgettable night that I’ll forever be grateful for.” Reese went on to say that she was “so proud and excited” to become the first professional athlete to participate in the show. Another star who made their debut at last night’s show was Missy Elliott, who took to the runway to perform a medley of her songs, including the smash hit, “Work It.” She rocked an all-black, sparkly look for the occasion, contrasting all of the pink and white on the catwalk. Law Roach and Jodie Turner-Smith were also in attendance, sitting front row to watch Missy’s performance. The actress looked absolutely stunning in an ethereal white ensemble and clean girl glam, all tied up in a bow with a slick-back ponytail. The first model to take the runway was pregnant Jasmine Tookes, who looked absolutely ethereal in a netted dress and Victoria’s Secret’s wings made to look like a seashell. The star, who is pregnant with her second child, a boy, with her husband, Juan David Borrero, showed off all her curves while strutting down the runway, making her growing baby bump the star of the show. Former WNBA player Kysre Gondrezick has been embracing other opportunities since her departure from the Chicago Sky, walking the red carpet wearing vintage Mugler. The baller was there to show her support for fellow athletes Suni Lee and, of course, her former teammate Angel Reese. Another beauty who walked the iconic stage was model Anok Yai, who likened her preparation for the show to how an athlete trains. “I’ve been getting my ass handed to me seven days a week by my trainer,” she said in an Oct. 14 Instagram post. “I’m getting my back muscles ready for the wings. I’m passing my walk, and my ass is going to be nice and round.” Precious Lee also made her Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show debut, wearing a lacy pink set with black accents, complete with a fluffy, showgirl-esque headpiece. To see more looks, watch the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show, in full, down below: Source: @angelreese 5 The post Real Life Angel: Baller Babe Angel Reese Makes Her Catwalk Debut At The 2025 Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show, Stunner’s Gorgeous Gams Garner Rave Reviews appeared first on Bossip.

Lauryn_Hill
News

Lauryn Hill Pens Heartfelt Tribute Letter To ‘Beacon...

Grammy-award-winning singer and songwriter Lauryn Hill took to Instagram to pay tribute to D’Angelo after news broke of his untimely passing. Hill Called D’Angelo An ‘Undeniable Beauty And Talent’ In Her Emotional Tribute Letter Hill, 50, collaborated with the neo-soul legend—who passed away after a private battle with pancreatic cancer—on the beloved track “Nothing Even Matters,” where he appeared as a guest vocalist. The soulful duet became a standout on her critically acclaimed, five-time Grammy-winning album, The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill. “People need reflection,” the music veteran began her emotional tribute letter. “I regret not having more time with you. Your undeniable beauty and talent were not of this world, and a presence not of this world needs protection in a world that covets light and the anointing of God. You sir, moved us, stirred us, inspired and even intimidated others to action with your genius.” The music giant thanked D’Angelo for “being a beacon of light to a generation and beyond who had no remembrance of the legacy that preceded us.” She continued, “Thank you for charting the course and for making space during a time when no similar space really existed. You imaged a unity of strength and sensitivity in Black manhood to a generation that only saw itself as having to be one or the other. It is my earnest prayer that you are in peace, far away from selfishness, fear, and/or controlling interests. Far from possessiveness, far from greed, far from manipulation, far from exploitation, far from intentionally designed chaos, and that you, Brother, are in peace, in bliss, and in eternal light and fulfillment with our Father in heaven.” Hill concluded her emotional tribute letter, “I love you and I miss you. May God grant peace and shelter to your family, true friends, and genuine appreciators, Brother, King.” D’Angelo Reflected On Working With Lauryn Hill During A 2008 Interview During an interview with Rolling Stone in 2008, D’Angelo reflected on his time working with Hill on “Nothing Even Matters,” calling his collaborative relationship with the songstress “warm and sweet.” “Originally, we were going to swap tunes for each other’s projects because I was working on Voodoo at the same time and my keyboardist James Poyser was also working with her,” D’Angelo told the publication. “I went to her house in New Jersey, she played a lot of songs for me, and gave me a rough copy to listen to. When Lauryn and I went into the studio together, I laid down my vocals in the course of an hour.” Jill Scott And Missy Elliott Also Paid Tribute Hill wasn’t the only celeb to write a tribute in honor of D’Angelo on Tuesday, Oct. 14. Jill Scott, another neo-soul titan, took to X to honor the singer’s legacy. She revealed that a mutual friend had informed her that the star was “unwell” a few days before his death. “I didn’t know he was leaving us TODAY” she added. “Oooooooh my condolences to his family, his musical fam and fans. I am a fan and I mourn. D. Keaton & now D’Angelo. Hurts.” In a follow-up post, she added, “I never met D’Angelo but I love him, respect him, admire his gift. This loss HURTS!! Love to my family that are family to him. I’m so sorry.  R.I.P. GENIUS.” Missy Elliott shared heartfelt condolences for D’Angelo’s son, Michael Archer II, whose mother, Angie Stone, tragically died in a car crash just seven months before D’Angelo’s passing. “Rest Peacefully D’Angelo,” The Rain singer wrote on X. “No parent wants to see their children go, but it’s painful for children to see their parents go too so send prayers up for his son, who also lost his mom this year, for strength.” RELATED: Remembering A Legend: 10 D’Angelo Songs That Shaped Neo-Soul The post Lauryn Hill Pens Heartfelt Tribute Letter To ‘Beacon Of A Generation’ D’Angelo—’May God Grant Peace & Shelter To Your Family’ appeared first on Bossip.

Judges_Gavel
Featured, News

Federal Judge Rules Trump Admin’s RIF Layoffs Amid...

Just last Friday, White House budget director and Project 2025 architect Russell Vought announced that reductions-in-force (RIF) layoffs had begun across federal government agencies amid the government shutdown that GOP leaders and White House officials have desperately tried to pin on the Democratic Party, despite Republicans having a stranglehold on just about all three branches of government. Well, on Wednesday, the Trump administration ran into its first roadblock in its agenda to purge the federal government’s workforce, which it had already talked extensively about doing long before the shutdown. Yet another federal judge has told the Trump administration no. According to NBC News, U.S. District Judge Susan Yvonne Illston of the Northern District of California ruled in favor of two unions that sued the Trump administration last month, ahead of the shutdown, and after White House officials began issuing public warnings about its plan to start RIF layoffs. “The activities that are being undertaken here are contrary to the laws,” Illston said. “You can’t do this in a nation of laws.” Illston said that the Trump administration had “taken advantage of the lapse in government spending and government functioning to assume that all bets are off, the laws don’t apply to them anymore, and they can impose the structures that they like on the government situation that they don’t like” — and, boy, was she spot on about that. As we previously reported, during a Cabinet meeting last Thursday, President Donald Trump explicitly said he would be using the shutdown to target government programs started by Democrats. “We’re only cutting Democrat programs, I hate to tell you, but we are cutting Democrat programs,” Trump reportedly said. “We will be cutting some very popular Democrat programs that aren’t popular with Republicans, frankly.” So, not because the programs are wasteful. Not because he can prove Democrats are wiping their butts with American taxpayer money. Trump is simply gambling the livelihoods of federal workers and the greater good of the American people in a partisan political game where the house, the White House to be exact, makes all of the rules. From NBC: Illston said that she believed the plaintiffs can demonstrate that the Trump administration’s actions were illegal, in excess of authority and “arbitrary and capricious.” Assistant U.S. Attorney Elizabeth Themins Hedges argued that employment-related harms were “reparable” and that losing employment was not an “irreparable harm.” But the judge issued a temporary restraining order, saying it would go into effect immediately. She said she plans to issue the order in writing later Wednesday. An earlier filing from the government stated that the administration had begun laying off at least 4,000 workers. Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, said that Trump “seems to think his government shutdown is distracting people from the harmful and lawlessness actions of his administration, but the American people are holding him accountable, including in the courts.” Perryman rightfully said Trump’s bid to target federal workers is “a move straight out of Project 2025’s playbook,” referring to the Heritage Foundation’s plan for America that Trump often claimed he “had nothing to do with” before implementing virtually all of its policies, and then, eventually, introducing Vought as his Cabinet member “of PROJECT 2025 Fame.“ Shout out to the good judge for standing with the workers and against this anti-worker administration. We’re going to need more like her to stand up, especially during this shutdown, which House Majority Speaker Mike Johnson recently warned barreling toward one of the longest shutdowns in American history” — which, if true, means it would surpass the longest government shutdown in nearly half a century, which came during the first term of, you guessed it, Donald J. Trump. SEE ALSO: Federal Workforce Layoffs Begin Amid Government Shutdown The Government Shutdown Has Officially Happened: What Happens Now, And Who Is To Blame?

Scroll to Top